Assassin s Creed III Remastered Metacritic Scores Explained: Critic and User Reviews

The Assassin's Creed III Remastered Metacritic page is the fastest way to see how the 2019 remaster landed with critics and players—and the gap between those two audiences is the story. That matters because the Assassin's Creed III Remastered Metacritic snapshot is mixed: critics average 72, users 5.8. Before you treat either number as a verdict, you need the dates, scopes, and review themes behind them.

What the Assassin's Creed III Remastered Metacritic Scores Say

As of 2026-11-09, Metacritic's Assassin's Creed III Remastered review page recorded a 72 Metascore from 31 critic reviews and a 5.8 user score from 486 user ratings. Metacritic labeled both aggregates "Mixed or Average." The same page lists PlayStation 4, Xbox One, PC, and Nintendo Switch as platforms and names Ubisoft as developer and publisher; the game released on March 29, 2019.

Snapshot captured 2026-11-09 from the aggregate Metacritic page; platform-specific pages may show different samples.

The aggregate is the right starting point, but it is not a single-platform score. The page lists platform-level critic counts alongside the aggregate, so use the platform breakdown if you need a format-specific read. The headline 72 and 5.8 are the aggregate values, not a PlayStation-only, Xbox-only, PC-only, or Switch-only verdict.

Critic Score Breakdown: 72 From 31 Reviews

The critic distribution explains why 72 feels more cautious than a simple pass/fail number. On the 2026-11-09 snapshot, Metacritic counted 15 positive critic reviews (48%), 16 mixed reviews (52%), and 0 negative reviews. The aggregate is not built on a wave of negative notices; it is built on a narrow majority of mixed reviews.

Selected critic reviews shown on the Metacritic page captured 2026-11-09. These are individual publication scores, not the aggregate Metascore.

The pattern across those excerpts is consistent. The higher-scoring reviews tend to reward the setting, the amount of content, and the remaster work itself. The mixed reviews tend to argue that better visuals and some mechanical adjustments do not fix the original game's dated structure. That is why the Assassin's Creed III Remastered Metacritic critic score reads as a qualified recommendation rather than a clear endorsement.

User Score Breakdown: 5.8 From 486 Ratings

The user side is harsher. On the same 2026-11-09 snapshot, Metacritic recorded 161 positive ratings (33%), 198 mixed ratings (41%), and 127 negative ratings (26%) from 486 user ratings. The 5.8 user score reflects a mixed-to-negative split across that full sample.

Community reports on the page cluster around a few friction points. Some players describe bugs, an open world that feels large but empty, buggy parkour, and secondary missions that do not justify the time. Others criticize simplistic combat, clunky movement, and underdeveloped side activities such as hunting. A separate thread of player experience defends the story, the historical setting, and the included DLC, which helps explain why the user score is mixed rather than uniformly negative.

The critic-user gap is the main takeaway. The selected critic reviews date from March and April 2019, while user ratings on the page include later posts. The Assassin's Creed III Remastered Metacritic page captures both conversations on one page, but they are not measuring the same thing.

What Critics Liked and What They Didn't

The strongest critic praise centers on context and package value. COGconnected's 85 highlights the colonial-America setting and the remaster's refreshed presentation. Areajugones' 77 frames the game as a worthwhile return to an entry the series had undervalued. GRYOnline.pl's 80 goes further, calling it the best remaster the series had received at that point while still noting uneven areas.

The criticism is more structural. IGN Spain's 73 says the remaster does not correct the original's major structural problems, even though it remains a recommended complete edition. TrueGaming's 70 says the visual enhancements and tweaked mechanics do not erase the same downfalls, while the plentiful content and The Tyranny of King Washington DLC help. XGN's 65 calls it a nice-to-have rather than a must-have. Metro GameCentral's 60 argues that even a high-quality remaster cannot hide that the underlying design belongs to an earlier era.

For a buyer, that split is useful. If you want the complete package—Assassin's Creed III, Assassin's Creed Liberation Remastered, and the solo DLC—the critic excerpts point to package value. If you need modern movement, tight combat, and consistently polished side content, the mixed reviews are warning you about the same friction points users mention.

How to Read the Assassin's Creed III Remastered Metacritic Page

• Check the snapshot date first. A score page is a moving record. The figures in this article are dated 2026-11-09 and should not be read as a live total.
• Keep critic and user scopes separate. The 72 comes from 31 critic reviews; the 5.8 comes from 486 user ratings. Combining them into one "score" would be misleading.
• Read the distribution, not just the average. A 72 built from 15 positive and 16 mixed reviews tells a different story than a 72 with a few extreme scores.
• Check the dates on user reviews. Later players may weigh the game differently than launch-window players did.
• Use the official store page for buying details. For pricing, system requirements, and edition contents, check the official Steam listing for Assassin's Creed III Remastered. The Metacritic page is for review context, not a live price check.

FAQ

Is the Assassin's Creed III Remastered Metacritic score good?

As of 2026-11-09, Metacritic recorded a 72 Metascore from 31 critic reviews and a 5.8 user score from 486 user ratings, both labeled "Mixed or Average." That makes the Assassin's Creed III Remastered Metacritic result mixed: critics saw a qualified package, while users were more divided.

Why is the user score lower than the critic score on Metacritic?

The 2026-11-09 snapshot shows critics at 72 and users at 5.8. The critic excerpts emphasize the setting, content volume, and remaster improvements; community reports more often mention bugs, empty open-world design, clunky parkour, and weak side activities. Those are different evaluation priorities, not necessarily a contradiction.

Does the Metacritic page cover every platform?

The page lists PlayStation 4, Xbox One, PC, and Nintendo Switch, and it displays platform-level critic counts. The headline figures cited here are the aggregate page values, not a platform-specific score. Check the platform-specific view you care about before treating the aggregate as your own buying signal.

Should I ignore the Assassin's Creed III Remastered Metacritic user score?

No—but do not treat it as a single verdict either. The Assassin's Creed III Remastered Metacritic user score is useful because it surfaces recurring friction points, especially around bugs and dated design. Read a handful of recent player reviews alongside the critic excerpts, then decide whether those tradeoffs matter to you.